Four Factors to Consider When Determining 2014 Ford Escape Gas Mileage

Four Factors to Consider When Determining 2014 Ford Escape Gas Mileage

When looking for a new vehicle, you might consider the 2014 Ford Escape gas mileage. This midsize SUV features four different powertrains that deliver a wide spread of horsepower, but fuel economy is a consistent concern for buyers. Here are four factors to consider when determining the gas mileage of your next vehicle. Keep reading to find out more. In addition to gas mileage, this vehicle offers performance and safety in a wide range of price ranges.

ford escape gas Mileage
ford escape gas Mileage

Fuel economy

The 2014 Ford Escape is a small sport utility vehicle with all-wheel drive, an automatic transmission, and a turbocharged engine. It is rated at 3.8 g/100 km city and highway. Its base engine is a 1.6 liter EcoBoost engine, which is also used in the Ford Fiesta ST. The new Escapes are also available with larger engines, which do not improve fuel economy.


The 2014 Ford Escape comes in three trim levels, down from four last year. While the base model is still available, it no longer comes with the SEL trim level. Instead, the vehicle comes with the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, paired with a six-speed automatic. This engine puts out 168 horsepower and is standard in only ten percent of the vehicle’s lineup. The rest are powered by the 2.7-liter EcoBoost V6.


When it comes to gas mileage, the 2014 Ford Escape is among the most efficient SUVs on the market. Its 1.6-liter EcoBoost engine is capable of achieving more than 174 mpg combined. A manual transmission and front-wheel drive are also available, but all three models offer a better gas mileage. The base Escape SE delivers a combined fuel mileage of 26 mpg. Regardless of the trim level, the Ford Escape is a great choice for families.


The Ford Escape is not the most fuel-efficient compact crossover, but it still manages to get decent mileage. Its base 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine is rated at 22 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway. But it isn’t the only engine that earns good mileage. Other powerplants like the turbocharged direct injection or the smaller displacement four-cylinder make the Escape more fuel-efficient. The 1.6-liter version offers 23/31 mpg city/highway, better than the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-5 base models.

Interior materials and materials

The interior of the 2014 Ford Escape is a combination of comfort and quality. It has a comfortable seat, with a four-spoke urethane steering wheel and a comprehensive array of controls. The materials used are high-quality and soft. A few features that make this car stand out are the rear-view camera and Perimeter Alarm. Ford has a reputation for excellent quietness, which is a plus in a small crossover.

Price difference between S and SE

If you’re in the market for a new family car, you may be wondering what the difference between the 2014 Ford Escape S and SE is. Essentially, the base model is the least expensive option, while the higher trim levels add more power and features. Ultimately, it comes down to what you’d like most from a vehicle. Here’s a closer look at the differences between the two trim levels.

EPA ratings

The new Ford Escape has all the functionality of an SUV with a fuel economy you can depend on. The Escape is available in four different engines, including a 2.0-liter EcoBoost engine and a plug-in hybrid. The turbocharged 1.6-liter engine is rated at 23 mpg city/highway, which is higher than the Honda CR-V and the Toyota RAV4. The new Escape’s gas mileage is better than its hybrid counterpart, but it’s not the most efficient vehicle on the road.

Test results

In third-party tests, the 2014 Ford Escape returned good fuel economy. The 1.6-liter EcoBoost engine returns 23/31 mpg city/highway. Its fuel economy is comparable to the Kia Sportage SX and the Range Rover Evoque. However, it falls short of many rivals. The vehicle’s powertrain offers only modest improvements over its predecessor. It produces 145 horsepower and 380 pound-feet of torque, making it an inefficient choice for families.

Leave a Comment